<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 7/24/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">Anand Chitipothu</b> <<a href="mailto:anandology@gmail.com">anandology@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span></div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">> However the status of Infogami and Webpy seem to be a bit dissapointing in<br>> the sense that the most prolific and original developer is no longer<br>
> maintaining either of those. It's a shame... looked like something that has<br>> lot of promise.<br><br>Did you say web.py is not under active development?</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>Yup. I generally trust Ohloh's analysis -- while it may not be perfect, it is comprehensive in the parameters it considers for it's ratings. As per Ohloh, this is "web.py"'s profile --</div>
<div><a href="http://www.ohloh.net/projects/5941">http://www.ohloh.net/projects/5941</a></div>
<div>& this is Django's -- (ps> I still have no special love for Django)</div>
<div><a href="http://www.ohloh.net/projects/django">http://www.ohloh.net/projects/django</a></div>
<div><br> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">There are very exciting changes in queue for the upcoming 0.3 release.</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>Good to hear that. I guess with more check-ins happening, even the indicative Ohloh figures would go up. Not that the web.py enthusiasts should necessarily care about, however, a better image, some evangelism wouldn't hurt.</div>
<div><br>cheers,</div>
<div>Banibrata</div>