<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
<br>> > A fairer comparison might be comparing OCaml to Psycho.<br>> ><br>> > Also, can Python do things that OCaml can't?<br>> <br>> LOL. Have you ever heard of "Turing-completeness", or "Church's Thesis"?<br><br>Edward,<br><br>Yeah I know all about the theoretical stuff;<br>I was looking for a commercial answer, aka "does anyone actually seriously use OCAML and for what?".<br>As far as I know noone much uses OCAML much, so a historical rant about Python 1.x from<br>an OCAML enthusiast doesn't carry much weight.<br>The only criticisms he made about OO back in Python 1.x, I was slightly curious whether there was<br>more or less to OCAML than meets the eye.<br><br>(By analogy, I looked into XSLT 18mths ago and that was overstyled nonsense, as in,<br>I could write clean functionally-equivalent Python with >10x fewer lines and much more clarity.)<br><br>Regards,<br>Stephen<br><br /><hr />Bing brings you health info from trusted sources. <a href='http://www.bing.com/search?q=pet+allergy&form=MHEINA&publ=WLHMTAG&crea=TXT_MHEINA_Health_Health_PetAllergy_1x1' target='_new'>Try it now!</a></body>
</html>