OH MY EYES!!!<br><br>Bryce<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Simeon Franklin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:simeonf@gmail.com">simeonf@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Lucas Wiman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lucas.wiman@gmail.com" target="_blank">lucas.wiman@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
The "corrected" version in the comments is quite good. Also, you can replace all 15 nested for loops with one call to itertools.product, and all 15 if statements to one very compact line, so I'm not sure you can really blame Python here. <br>
</blockquote></div><div><br>Oh I'm definitely blaming the programmer on this one! You can write ugly code in any language - and beautiful code in most languages as well. Some languages work with you instead of against you - that's why I love Python!<br>
<br>-regards<br><font color="#888888">Simeon Franklin<br><br></font></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Baypiggies mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Baypiggies@python.org">Baypiggies@python.org</a><br>
To change your subscription options or unsubscribe:<br>
<a href="http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/baypiggies" target="_blank">http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/baypiggies</a><br></blockquote></div><br>