[Catalog-sig] Proposal: Move PyPI static data to the cloud for better availability (version 2)
"Martin v. Löwis"
martin at v.loewis.de
Tue Jun 29 23:22:55 CEST 2010
> I'm surprised, what specific mod_wsgi configuration did you try?
Not sure I understand the question:
WSGIDaemonProcess pypi display-name=wsgi-pypi processes=10 threads=1
WSGIScriptAlias /pypi /data/pypi/src/pypi/pypi.wsgi
WSGIScriptAlias /simple /data/pypi/src/pypi/pypi.wsgi
According to the bzr log, I reverted that because Python would crash
(with a core dump).
> > PyPI right now is really quite reliable,
> > these small changes would I think be low-risk and less likely to
> > introduce new problems while addressing what I suspect is the
> source of
> > problems.
> I disagree that these are small and low-risk. The WSGI switch will risk
> stability; the others (generate static pages) will not be small, and
> risk correctness.
> I don't really know how to describe "small" or "low-risk"... maybe I
> should say "smaller" and "lesser-risk" than the full CDN proposal.
Ah, ok - relatively speaking.
That is certainly true: the CDN proposal has more risk to not work
More information about the Catalog-SIG