[Catalog-sig] egg_info in PyPI
"Martin v. Löwis"
martin at v.loewis.de
Mon Sep 20 22:16:43 CEST 2010
> I think most of the response was targeted at the EGG-INFO
> meta-data format, not the information itself.
My impression was otherwise: several posters clearly indicated
that they don't want exposition of this information (in whatever
form), as they expected it would hinder adoption of PEP 345.
> If you look at the above mess of upper- and lower-case filenames,
> files which only serve as marker and others having actual
> content, different content types, etc. I think it's clear
> that using this particular format is not a good idea.
> We can do better :-)
Unfortunately, it seems, not with the data available.
More information about the Catalog-SIG