[Catalog-sig] Catalog-SIG Digest, Vol 86, Issue 33
pydanny at gmail.com
Wed Apr 20 15:44:29 CEST 2011
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:14:30 +1000
> From: Richard Jones <richard at python.org>
> To: anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com>
> Cc: catalog-sig <catalog-sig at python.org>
> Subject: Re: [Catalog-sig] Remove rating vs turn off
> Message-ID: <BANLkTikF5ZSBy1yfYSsxkaoCGLee4nW1GQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 12:20 AM, anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I see that ratings were removed from source code base, not turned off.
>> Why? I like the idea to have my own _private_ ratings, flags, keyword
>> and list of important bugs for package versions and sharing it with
>> other people via OpenSocial API, for example.
> Please submit this kind of idea to the Packaginator or similar projects.
Richard is right.
Packaginator lets you stand up your own version of the tool, which
merely grabs from PyPI various stats. While Packaginator core will
never include a private rating system (everything is based on hard
metrics because ratings are too easily skewed), we are working on an
API so you can add that sort of functionality to your own instance
without forking so hard you can't accept patches.
However, as for integrating the complexity of OpenSocial API, thats
something you can do in your own fork.
'Knowledge is Power'
More information about the Catalog-SIG