[Catalog-sig] PyPI trove classifiers for alternate language implementations
fuzzyman at gmail.com
Sun Oct 16 17:06:21 CEST 2011
On 16 September 2011 00:18, M.-A. Lemburg <mal at egenix.com> wrote:
> Michael Foord wrote:
> > On 15 September 2011 15:24, M.-A. Lemburg <mal at egenix.com> wrote:
> >> "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> >>>> Programming Language - Python - Implementation - CPython
> >>>> Programming Language - Python - Implementation - pypy
> >>>> Programming Language - Python - Implementation - jython
> >>>> Programming Language - Python - Implementation - IronPython
> >>> Opinions on this proposal? (including the specific spelling,
> >>> leaving alone that the separator is ::, not -)
> >> Better user CPython, PyPy and Jython for consistency with the
> >> other Trove spellings.
> >> I'm -0 on the "Implementation" part. Do we really need this ?
> > Jython, PyPy and CPython are not "programming languages" they're
> > implementations of the Python programming language - so I would prefer to
> > differentiate like this.
> Well, yes, but if you look at the OS section of the Trove list
> you also find different implementations of BSD under the
> BSD category:
> Operating System :: POSIX :: BSD
> Operating System :: POSIX :: BSD :: BSD/OS
> Operating System :: POSIX :: BSD :: FreeBSD
> Operating System :: POSIX :: BSD :: NetBSD
> Operating System :: POSIX :: BSD :: OpenBSD
Well, they're BSD variants whereas pypy (and other implementations) aim very
much not to be variants. I'd still rather see them listed under a Python
implementation sub-classifier but it isn't a big deal.
> (just to take one exmaple)
> See http://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=list_classifiers for the full
> Also note that Cython is listed as:
> Programming Language :: Cython
That's correct. Cython is a programming language not an implementation. I
would include Shedskin as a programming language rather than an
implementation too. Listing implementations as programming languages loses
the ability to make this distinction at the classifier level (and is also
*incorrect* to my mind).
> even Zope is listed as programming language:
> Programming Language :: Zope
That's odd. :-)
> so there isn't all that much consistency in the naming.
> BTW: Stackless is missing from your list.
Right. Stackless should probably be on the list as libraries may depend on
All the best,
> >> Also: What about release versions of those implementations ?
> > We could always add those later if anyone really wanted them (for Python
> > have the broad "Python" *plus* version specific categories). In other
> > YAGNI (for now).
> > Michael
> >> Jython and IronPython appear to follow the CPython release
> >> versions, but PyPy uses its own version scheme.
> Marc-Andre Lemburg
> Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Sep 16 2011)
> >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/
> >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/
> >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/
> 2011-10-04: PyCon DE 2011, Leipzig, Germany 18 days to go
> ::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! ::::
> eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
> D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
> Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611
May you do good and not evil
May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others
May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
-- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Catalog-SIG