hellos,<br><br>Is it just me, or are these classifiers not as good as tags?<br><br>Should people really have to discuss and get approved what tags they put on their software?<br><br>Seems like a big waste of everyones time, and doesn't result in as good a database.<br>
<br>cheers,<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/4/17 Tarek Ziadé <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ziade.tarek@gmail.com">ziade.tarek@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
2009/4/16 "Martin v. Löwis" <<a href="mailto:martin@v.loewis.de">martin@v.loewis.de</a>>:<br>
<div class="im">>> I don't see it in the list (just LGPL without any version detail), I<br>
>> am ccing this request to catalog-sig so<br>
>> they can add it if they think it's wise<br>
><br>
> How should this be done? As a separate classifier with the suffix v3,<br>
> or as a subclassifier of LGPL?<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>Looking at others (Mozilla Public License) I would go for a separate<br>
one with the suffix.<br>
<br>
But what about LGPL 2 and 2.1 (It seems that 2.1 is introduces a lot<br>
of changes) ?<br>
<br>
Maybe "LGPL2+" would be better for the 2.x series (and maybe 2+ includes v3 ?)<br>
<br>
Maybe we could ask someone at the FSF so we have the best versions in<br>
our Trove classifier.<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
Tarek<br>
<br>
> Regards,<br>
> Martin<br>
<div class="im">><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Tarek Ziadé | <a href="http://ziade.org" target="_blank">http://ziade.org</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">Catalog-SIG mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Catalog-SIG@python.org">Catalog-SIG@python.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig" target="_blank">http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>