[C++-sig] Re: Boost 1.32 and Python 2.4
David Abrahams
dave at boost-consulting.com
Mon Dec 6 16:51:21 CET 2004
Paul F. Kunz wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 10:12:02 -0500, Nicolas Fleury
>>>>>> <nidoizo at yahoo.com> said:
>
>
>> Nicolas Fleury wrote:
>>
>>> Finally, does boost 1.32 supports Python 2.4?
>
>
>> So I guess there's no official answer. If I plan to switch to 1.32
>> and 2.4, is it recommended to use a more recent version of
>> Boost.Python? Is the CVS version suppose to work with 1.32? Does
>> it use the relatively "stable" public interface of other Boost
>> libraries, or does it use some internals that may have changed
>> since 1.32 branching? Any help on direction to take is very
>> appreciated. Thx and regards, Nicolas
>
>
> I switched to boost 1.32.0 and Python 2.4 with no problems. I
> least, I think I did, but did not get the warnings about
> _POSIX_C_SOURCE when I compiled boost. This makes me think that
> maybe seting the environment variable PYTHON_VERSION to 2.4 didn't
> actually work. I don't know how to verify that boost really did
> compile with Python 2.4 installed in /usr/local instead of Python 2.2
> in /usr.
You can always run bjam with -n to see what command lines will be issued
(and -a to rebuild everything).
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com
More information about the Cplusplus-sig
mailing list