[C++-sig] Re: implicitly_convertible and char*
dleary at gmail.com
Sat Jul 3 17:53:12 CEST 2004
so, any news on this?
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:49:39 -0400, David Abrahams
<dave at boost-consulting.com> wrote:
> "Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <rwgk at yahoo.com> writes:
> > I don't really feel competent in this matter, but I believe char const* and
> > const char* are two different things. Did you try it with "const char*"?
> They are the same thing.
> Dave Abrahams
> Boost Consulting
> C++-sig mailing list
> C++-sig at python.org
More information about the Cplusplus-sig