<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jun 29, 2016, at 23:09, Jay Gupta <<a href="mailto:cooljay.gupta@gmail.com" class="">cooljay.gupta@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><span style="font-family: Menlo-Regular; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !important;" class="">could you provide concrete examples of your criticism of other Python cryptographic packages, especially about poor algorithm interpretations?</span><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class="">What specific criticism are you referring to? Cryptography developers have been critical of other packages (and their own!) in a variety of contexts.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">-glyph</div></body></html>