<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On 21 November 2015 at 07:34, Wes Turner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wes.turner@gmail.com" target="_blank">wes.turner@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">Looks great, thanks!<br></p>
<p dir="ltr"><a href="https://warehouse.python.org/" target="_blank">https://warehouse.python.org/</a> > "Top Projects" / "New Releases" > "Show more" > <a href="https://warehouse.python.org/TODO" target="_blank">https://warehouse.python.org/TODO</a> > 404</p>
<p dir="ltr">- [ ] ENH: <a href="http://schema.org/SoftwareApplication" target="_blank">schema.org/SoftwareApplication</a> ./Code JSONLD, RDFa linked data</p></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Wes, the JSON-LD spec isn't going anywhere, so we can adopt it whenever we decide it's useful to do so. However, that also means that bringing it up in every single discussion in the meantime is annoying, not helpful. You've been heard, and JSON-LD is indeed interesting, it just doesn't solve any high priority problems for the Python packaging ecosystem.<br><br></div></div>Regards,<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Nick.<br clear="all"></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Nick Coghlan   |   <a href="mailto:ncoghlan@gmail.com" target="_blank">ncoghlan@gmail.com</a>   |   Brisbane, Australia</div>
</div></div>