[Doc-SIG] docstring grammar
Mon, 29 Nov 1999 13:44:23 -0600
Contains an old summary of the formatting rules for Structured Text use in
Oddly Dan's subscription to this list is disabled, probably from an old
address. The latest address I have for him is Daniel.Larsson@telia.com
----- Original Message -----
From: David Ascher <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Robin Friedrich <email@example.com>
Cc: <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Daniel Larsson
Sent: Monday, November 29, 1999 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Doc-SIG] docstring grammar
> On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Robin Friedrich wrote:
> > Some people on this list should remember the development days of gendoc
> > it's cleaner successor pythondoc written by Dan Larsson (gosh I hope I'm
> > the only one)!
> Yes, I remember it. Thanks for the reminder and pointer, Robin!
> > We pleaded back then for ideas/opinions/hacked code to help improve the
> > working code Dan wrote but got little response.
> FWIW, I think that one problem gendoc/pythondoc had in terms of strategy
> was that it was billed as a 'tool'. I think that if we establish a
> 'blessed standard' then any standard-compliant tool has a guaranteed user
> base, and has a far greater likelihood of long-term success. Also, once
> the format is documented, then folks who don't like gendoc or for whatever
> reason want to do it 'their own way' can still do it in a compatible way.
> I'll start digging in gendoc to see the differences between its format and
> what I've been discussing. I'd love to leverage it to build a reference
> Dan Larsson, are you reading this discussion? We could use your
> experience here!