On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:07 AM, DeanG <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:goodmansond@gmail.com">goodmansond@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
+1<br>
<br>
Regarding the Args Kwargs, Matt Harrisons "Guide to: Learning Python<br>
Decorators" was a great read for this topic.<br>
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Guide-Learning-Python-Decorators-ebook/dp/B006ZHJSIM" target="_blank">http://www.amazon.com/Guide-Learning-Python-Decorators-ebook/dp/B006ZHJSIM</a><br><br></blockquote><div><br><br>I'm quite tempted to buy a Kindle. I had no idea there was a whole Kindle book on decorators.<br>
<br>
Yes, decorators would have to be another one of those Standard Gotta Have It track talks we edu-siggers are focused on.<br>
<br>
ArgsKwags, IterStuff, Decorators, Metaclasses, Introspection... Dialectical Differences<br><br>Library: talks always welcome, standard usergroup fare (Portland's groups always has Module of the Month)<br><br>3rd party: IDEs (e.g. I-Python), VIsualization (e.g. Blender, VPython, Pygame, matplotlib). Web (Django, web2py, Google App Engine)<br>
<br>
Python plays well with others, so a lot of Design Patterns stuff
relating to OO in general would could push off to those OSCON type
events where we have Java, Python, Ruby, Perl, C++ all under one big
tent.<br>
<br>
There should be like OO track topics that don't count against the Python quota, if ya know what I mean.<br>
<br>
Kirby<br>
<br><br></div></div>