[I18n-sig] Re: Patch 101320: doc strings
Martin v. Loewis
Wed, 6 Sep 2000 08:29:58 +0200
> Not sure. I think you and Francois do, so I'll defer. One issue is
> for 3rd party modules, and for modules that migrate into the core. At
> the very least, 3rd party modules will /not/ be in the "python"
> domain, but if they are migrated into the core, that may change.
Indeed, having a single textual domain for all extensions would not be
feasible; they certainly will have their own domain.
> I sent out a message about a file system layout for including the
> files in the nondist tree of the CVS repository. Did you read that
> message Martin?
Just to repeat the proposal here, it was
> What did you think?
I'd do (replace-regexp "docstrings" "python") now, but apart from
that: sounds good to me. I'll extract the strings from the official
2.0b1, then try to create this structure.