<html><head></head><body>And of course I meant import-sig.<br>
-- <br>
Eric.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">"Eric V. Smith" <eric@trueblade.com> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
I think restarting the discussion anew here on distutils-sig is appropriate.<br>
-- <br>
Eric.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; font-family: sans-serif">Martin has asked me to decide on PEP 382 vs. PEP 402 (namespace<br />packages) in time for inclusion of the decision in Python 3.3. As<br />people who attended the language-sig know, I am leaning towards PEP<br />402 but I admit that at this point I don't have enough information. If<br />I have questions, should I be asking them on the import-sig or on<br />python-dev? Is it tolerable if I ask questions even if the answer is<br />somewhere in the archives? (I spent a lot of time reviewing the<br />"pitchfork thread",<br /><a href="http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/064400.html">http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/064400.html</a>,<br />but that wasn't particularly fruitful, so I'm worried I'd just waste<br />my time browsing the archives -- if the PEP authors did their jobs<br />well the PEPs should include summaries of the discussion anyways.)<br /><br />-
- <br
/>--Guido van Rossum (<a href="http://python.org/~guido">python.org/~guido</a>)<br /><hr /><br />Import-SIG mailing list<br />Import-SIG@python.org<br /><a href="http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/import-sig">http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/import-sig</a><br /><br /></pre></blockquote></div></blockquote></div></body></html>