[Inpycon] Received the MOA
Anand Balachandran Pillai
abpillai at gmail.com
Mon Feb 22 08:19:37 CET 2010
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:45 PM, satyaakam goswami <satyaakam at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon at au-kbc.org>wrote:
>> On Saturday 20 Feb 2010 7:38:57 pm Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
>> > > I received the MoA at my address just now and am heading over shortly
>> > > the GNUnify venue. I was a bit surprised though, weren't we also
>> > > to include the address proof alongwith the document ? or should we be
>> > > mailing that directly to Kenneth ?
>> > You just have to sign the document. As for the address proof, you need
>> > to mail a self attested copy directly to Kenneth. This is what I know.
>> yes - and my snail mail box is still empty
> we have kept our self attested address proof in the signed document
> envelope itself.
Why ? Now, it un-necessarily does the rounds along with the MoA to others
increasing the chance of loss or damage. I didn't understand this. I had
clearly to send the address proofs directly to Kenneth and only pass the
along the channel.
> Inpycon mailing list
> Inpycon at python.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Inpycon