[Inpycon] CFP draft for review
Anand Balachandran Pillai
abpillai at gmail.com
Fri Jun 11 07:40:50 CEST 2010
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Anand Chitipothu <anandology at gmail.com>wrote:
> 2010/6/11 Noufal Ibrahim <noufal at gmail.com>:
> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Anand Chitipothu <anandology at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >> [..]
> >> >> 2. I had added "Description" in the CFP for detailed outline for
> >> >> reviewers
> >> >> plus notes. It is not possible to review a proposal with just a
> >> >> which we say should not be more than 100 words. This is required
> >> >> in the interface.
> >> >
> >> > It is not clear to me. Do you want a description/notes field only for
> >> > reviewers? The interface for reviewers is not built yet and I'll
> >> > include that field when I build that.
> >> [..]
> > Anand B.'s point is that there should be a "summary" field and a separate
> > "description" field.
> > The summary field is a very short (less than 100 words) summary of the
> > presentation which will be displayed on the site when someone clicks on
> > talk etc. It's how the public will know what the talk is about.
> > The Description field will be long and detailed describing exactly what
> > talker is intending to talk about. This is what the reviewers will look
> > to see if this talk can be selected or not. People will not be uploading
> > entire slide deck etc. when they register their talk but they will *have*
> > fill this and this is what will be used to review the talk and decide
> > whether we're going to have it or not.
> > Right?
> > I think this makes sense
> Summary. (summary of your talk in less than 100 words).
> Description (describe your talk in detail for reviewers)
> I'm not quite happy with the the description of the "description"
> field. Any suggestions?
The current description looks fine to me. Actually you don't need
a description of the description. Just do as follows.
Outline (A detailed outline of your talk, for reviewers only)
Notes (Notes for reviewers, if any)
> Inpycon mailing list
> Inpycon at python.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Inpycon