<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Anand Chitipothu <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:anandology@gmail.com">anandology@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
2010/6/11 Noufal Ibrahim <<a href="mailto:noufal@gmail.com">noufal@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">><br>
><br>
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Anand Chitipothu <<a href="mailto:anandology@gmail.com">anandology@gmail.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> [..]<br>
>> >> 2. I had added "Description" in the CFP for detailed outline for<br>
>> >> reviewers<br>
>> >> plus notes. It is not possible to review a proposal with just a summary<br>
>> >> which we say should not be more than 100 words. This is required<br>
>> >> in the interface.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > It is not clear to me. Do you want a description/notes field only for<br>
>> > reviewers? The interface for reviewers is not built yet and I'll<br>
>> > include that field when I build that.<br>
>> [..]<br>
><br>
> Anand B.'s point is that there should be a "summary" field and a separate<br>
> "description" field.<br>
><br>
> The summary field is a very short (less than 100 words) summary of the<br>
> presentation which will be displayed on the site when someone clicks on the<br>
> talk etc. It's how the public will know what the talk is about.<br>
><br>
> The Description field will be long and detailed describing exactly what the<br>
> talker is intending to talk about. This is what the reviewers will look at<br>
> to see if this talk can be selected or not. People will not be uploading the<br>
> entire slide deck etc. when they register their talk but they will *have* to<br>
> fill this and this is what will be used to review the talk and decide<br>
> whether we're going to have it or not.<br>
><br>
> Right?<br>
><br>
> I think this makes sense<br>
<br>
</div></div>OK.<br>
<br>
Summary. (summary of your talk in less than 100 words).<br>
<br>
Description (describe your talk in detail for reviewers)<br>
<br>
I'm not quite happy with the the description of the "description"<br>
field. Any suggestions?<br></blockquote><div><br> The current description looks fine to me. Actually you don't need<br>a description of the description. Just do as follows.<br><br>Description <br><br>Outline (A detailed outline of your talk, for reviewers only)<br>
<textarea><br><br>Notes (Notes for reviewers, if any)<br><textarea><br><br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<font color="#888888"><br>
Anand<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Inpycon mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Inpycon@python.org">Inpycon@python.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon" target="_blank">http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>--Anand<br><br><br><br>