Thanks for the lightning fast response, Michael!<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 7/15/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Michael Foord</b> <<a href="mailto:fuzzyman@voidspace.org.uk">fuzzyman@voidspace.org.uk</a>> wrote:
</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">I haven't tried it, but they *should* be compatible. Pickle uses its own<br>stack based language to write out objects - so for pure Python it should
<br>work fine.</blockquote><div><br>Okay, cool. I'll give it a try. <br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">As pickle is a pure Python module which works (I'm pretty sure I tried
<br>it back in the past !?!) with IronPython, the semantics should be unchanged.</blockquote><div><br>Right on. I'll let you know what I discover. Just to give you some background, Sylvain and I are looking at using memcached and pickled Python objects as a form of InterProcess Communication between cPython and .NET via IronPython. If that works as it should, we then plan to look into adding Axon/Kamaelia to the mix to handle the concurrency aspect of passing around data objects between disparate systems.
<br><br>For the curious, I will update this thread once the first part is working properly.<br><br>Thanks for your help!</div></div><br>-- <br>/M:D<br><br>M. David Peterson<br><a href="http://mdavid.name">http://mdavid.name
</a> | <a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354">http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354</a> | <a href="http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155">http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155</a>