[Mailman-developers] Bug: includes Reply-To in administrative messages
Barry A. Warsaw
bwarsaw@CNRI.Reston.Va.US (Barry A. Warsaw)
Mon, 27 Apr 1998 11:14:01 -0400 (EDT)
>>>>> "JS" == Janne Sinkkonen <janne@avocado.pc.helsinki.fi> writes:
JS> If the 'reply to list' option is set, mailman seems to put an
JS> erroneous 'Reply-To:' header into administrative messages as
JS> well, for example to reminders to administrators about pending
JS> messages. (Then the administrators discuss what to do, and the
JS> discussion goes to the list.)
Mailman should never add a Reply-to header. Please see the seminal
paper on this:
"Reply-to" Munging Considered Harmful
<http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>
"Some forms of header munging are helpful, such as special
loop-detection headers. Others are questionable. Most are ill-advised
or dangerous. Many list adminstrators want to add a Reply-To header
that points back to the list. This transformation also is one of the
most ill-advised.
Some administrators claim that Reply-To munging makes it easier for
users to respond to the entire list, and helps encourage list
traffic. These benefits are fallacious. Moreover, Reply-To can have
harmful -- even dangerous -- effects. If you think Reply-To munging
is a good idea, I hope I can change your mind."
-Barry