[Mailman-Developers] List-* header suggestion
John A. Martin
jam@jamux.com
Fri, 29 Sep 2000 11:11:08 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>>>>> "RJ" == Ron Jarrell
>>>>> "Re: [Mailman-Developers] List-* header suggestion"
>>>>> Fri, 29 Sep 2000 10:32:06 -0400
>> Would the long List-* header fields be more attractive and
>> easier to read if they were folded something like the
>> following?
>>
>> List-Subscribe: <http://www.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers>,
>> <mailto:mailman-developers-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
>> List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers>,
>> <mailto:mailman-developers-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>> Perhaps folding after the comma would be OK unless the whole
>> field is not greater than, say, 78 characters?
RJ> Umm, the headers *are* folded.. In the very note that arrived
RJ> from you, they were folded that way. Unless a friendly MTA on
RJ> the way to me folded them for me, or unfolded them for you...
I meant _folding a mail header field_ as described in rfc822 section
3.1.1. Standards compliant MTAs won't fold or unfold a header field
that it does not itself create. The header fields in question are not
now folded. Perhaps your MUA wraps long lines.
jam
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: OpenPGP encrypted mail preferred. See <http://www.gnupg.org/>
iEYEARECAAYFAjnUsOoACgkQUEvv1b/iXy8LnwCfU7HopG5jPE0Eo4iD/B2YkYpo
UFMAn3SQBt+/BYiOaM2K7QmUohMbjMBb
=JWKu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----