[Mailman-Developers] Bug priorities (for 2.1.3)?
bernhard at intevation.de
Thu Oct 2 03:22:19 EDT 2003
Congratulation for getting 2.1.3 out of the door!
I have a question and a remark regarding the handling of bugs:
* What attributes do bugs need to get into the next release
when a fix is available. As announced on the 14th of August to this
list I fixed a priority 7 bug and did not receive feedback on it.
Is there a special reason why it wasn't included in the 2.1.3 release?
[ 665732 ] List-Id should be one line.
* There is a very annoying bug (reproduced with 2.1.2, 2.1.3 test
scheduled) in environments where people sign their emails,
because Mailman breaks the signature.
[ 815297 ] Breaking signatures in message/rfc822 attachement!
I suggest raising the priority of this bug,
because it might give Mailman a bad reputation with
security aware people.
And once established such an image is hard to loose again.
Professional Service for Free Software (intevation.net)
The FreeGIS Project (freegis.org)
Association for a Free Informational Infrastructure (ffii.org)
FSF Europe (fsfeurope.org)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/attachments/20031002/ccedf8eb/attachment.bin
More information about the Mailman-Developers