[Mailman-Developers] AOL's requirements for spam
brad.knowles at skynet.be
Fri Jan 30 16:32:07 EST 2004
At 3:16 PM -0500 2004/01/30, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I'd support such an effort. I think the right way to go about this
> would be to design a protocol (or perhaps an API) for MLM/MTA
> communication. I'd be less enthusiastic about a solution that was
> unique to a particular MTA.
Agreed. I think that would be a poor choice.
> Hey Brad, maybe you can dust off those protocol specs you once did. Or
> maybe you can make some first passes at a new specification. That would
> be a good jumping off point for approaching the MTA communities.
Sorry, we never got to the specs stage. We got to talking about
things, then talking about the spam issue, and then the whole idea
basically died right there.
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
More information about the Mailman-Developers