<div dir="ltr"><span style="font-size:small;font-family:arial">On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Todd </span><span dir="ltr" style="font-size:small;font-family:arial"><<a href="mailto:toddrjen@gmail.com" target="_blank">toddrjen@gmail.com</a>></span><span style="font-size:small;font-family:arial"> wrote:</span><br>

<div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">But wouldn't there be a benefit from integrating ndarrays directly into the grammar like lists, tuples, and dictionaries?</p>

</blockquote></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div>That was never on the table. The benefit of ndarray literals is relatively tiny and does not justify a change to the grammar.<br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Robert Kern
</div></div>