[Patches] [ python-Patches-904720 ] dict.update should take a
2-tuple sequence like dict.__init_
SourceForge.net
noreply at sourceforge.net
Thu Feb 26 20:28:03 EST 2004
Patches item #904720, was opened at 2004-02-25 20:05
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gvanrossum
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=904720&group_id=5470
Category: Core (C code)
Group: Python 2.4
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bob Ippolito (etrepum)
Assigned to: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum)
Summary: dict.update should take a 2-tuple sequence like dict.__init_
Initial Comment:
This patch allows:
d = {}
d.update([(1,2), (3,4)])
The current way to do it is (unfortunately):
d = {}
d.update(dict([(1,2), (3,4)]))
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum)
Date: 2004-02-26 20:28
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=6380
-1 here
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Bob Ippolito (etrepum)
Date: 2004-02-26 20:02
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=139309
The (__doc__) documentation doesn't cover that case.. it says "new..."
for every signature of dict.__init__.
Attempting to call __init__ multiple times isn't really an obvious thing to
do, because it almost never does what you want. I would chalk that up
to an implementation detail of dict, not intended behavior :)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger)
Date: 2004-02-26 19:53
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=80475
Though not exactly obvious, this functionality and more is
available through dict.__init__().
Since it would be a change to an important API, referring to
Guido for pronouncement. My vote is -0.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=904720&group_id=5470
More information about the Patches
mailing list