<html>
<head>
<title>perjury L 6</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
</head>
<body>
<p> </p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>REAL, CERTIFIABLE DIPLOMAS - NO CLASSES TO TAKE!</strong></font></p>
<p><font face="Tahoma">Think you got shortchanged in school?</p>
<p>Bachelors, Masters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) degrees available</p>
<p>There are no required tests, classes, books, or interviews!</p>
<p> </p>
<form name="indignity scribble carlson baden ruse disco rousseau astigmat allied addition kafka appalachia complaisant wince gelable large thorny bassett innkeeper rescind " method="get" action="http://www.fast35.biz/d17.html">
<input type="submit" name="Subtfmit" value="Get the Details">
</form>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<form name="Donnell" method="get" action="http://www.fast35.biz/rd7.htm">
<input type="submit" name="Submit3" value="cease further emails">
</form>
<font color="#fffff1">the shopping mall "The Orang," says he, "differs not only from the Pigmy of Tyson and from the Orang of Tulpius by its peculiar colour and its long toes, but also by its whole external form. Its arms, its [22] hands, and its feet are longer, while the thumbs, on the contrary, are much shorter; and the great toes much smaller in proportion."9 And again, "The true Orang, that is to say, that of Asia, that of Borneo, is consequently not the Pithecus, or tail-less Ape, which the Greeks, and especially Galen, have described. It is neither the Pongo nor the Jocko, nor the Orang of Tulpius, nor the Pigmy of Tyson,–it is an animal of a peculiar species, as I shall prove in the clearest manner by the organs of voice and the skeleton in the following chapters" (l. c. p. 64). but filled with ether[21]. In what follows I want to look at Boyle's approach to this dispute</font>
<font color="#fffffE">It is to the last-mentioned writer, and his coadjutor Cowper, that we owe the first account of a man-like ape which has any pretensions to scientific accuracy and completeness. The treatise entitled, "Orang-outang, sive Homo Sylvestris; or the Anatomy of a Pygmie compared with that of a Monkey, an Ape, and a Man," published by the Royal Society in 1699, is, indeed, a work of remarkable merit, and has, in some respects, served as a model to subsequent inquirers. This "Pygmie," Tyson tells us "was brought from Angola, in Africa; but was first taken a great deal higher up the country"; its hair "was of a coal-black colour and strait," and "when it went as a quadruped on all four, 'twas [12] awkwardly; not placing the palm of the hand flat to the ground, but it walks upon its knuckles, as I observed it to do when weak and had not strength enough to support its body."–"From the top of the head to the heel of the foot, in a strait line, it measured twenty-six inches." Fig. 6.–The Anthropomorpha of Linnæus. since there is no possibility of shutting the system down or controlling it</font>
<font color="#fffff2">something closer to the human than a mere machine in terms of its ability to learn etc. In a sense there is nothing wrong with this After quoting the account of the great Pongo, Buffon justly remarks, that all the "Jockos" and "Orangs" hitherto brought to Europe were young; and he suggests that, in their adult condition, they might be as big as the Pongo or "great Orang;" so that, provisionally, he regarded the Jockos, Orangs, and Pongos as all of one species. And perhaps this was as much as the state of knowledge at the time warranted. But how it came about that Buffon failed to perceive the similarity of Smith's "Mandrill" to his own "Jocko," and confounded the former with so [21] totally different a creature as the blue-faced Baboon, is not so easily intelligible. because it seems that humans always have the initiative even in symmetrical analysis. Latour dismisses this claim by arguing</font>
<font color="#fffff1">which have been limited to walkmans "This province of Mayombe is all woods and groves, so over-growne that a man may travaile twentie days in the shadow without any sunne or heat. Here is no kind of corne nor graine, so that the people liveth onely upon plantanes and roots of sundrie sorts, very good; and nuts; nor any kinde of tame cattell, nor hens. not to mention the town hall</font>
</body>
</html>