[Python-3000] Renumbering old PEPs now targeted for Py3k?
g.brandl at gmx.net
Thu Jun 7 15:01:29 CEST 2007
Nick Coghlan schrieb:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> A few PEPs with numbers < 400 are now targeting Python 3000, e.g. PEP
>> 367 (new super) and PEP 344 (exception chaining). Are there any
>> others? I propose that we renumber these to numbers in the 3100+
>> range. I can see two forms of renaming:
>> (a) 344 -> 3344 and 367 -> 3367, i.e. add 3000 to the number
>> (b) just use the next available number
>> What other PEPs should be renumbered?
>> Should we renumber at all?
> +1 for renumbering to the next available 31xx number, with the old
> number kept as a pointer to the new one.
That would be my vote too.
Thus spake the Lord: Thou shalt indent with four spaces. No more, no less.
Four shall be the number of spaces thou shalt indent, and the number of thy
indenting shall be four. Eight shalt thou not indent, nor either indent thou
two, excepting that thou then proceed to four. Tabs are right out.
More information about the Python-3000