[Python-3000] [Python-3000-checkins] r54510 - in python/branches/p3yk/Lib: ConfigParser.py test/test_file.py
brett at python.org
Thu Mar 22 00:28:46 CET 2007
On 3/21/07, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> PDFL? Petty Dictator For Life? Poodle Dictator For Life? Perhaps
> Dictator For Life? :-)
=) Hey, I'm sick so I get to have a typo or four.
> I suggest that you update the PEP and then repost the pep on
> python-dev with a summary of the changes (to the PEP). I expect it to
> go smoothly.
> On 3/21/07, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> > On 3/21/07, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> > > On 3/21/07, Collin Winter <collinw at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 3/21/07, brett.cannon <python-3000-checkins at python.org> wrote:
> > > > > When removing indexing/slicing on exceptions some places were changed
> > > > > inappropriately from ``e`` to ``e.message`` instead of ``e.args``. The
> > > > > reason it needs to be the last option is the dichotomy of 'message' and 'args':
> > > > > 'message' can be the empty string but args can have a value if more than one
> > > > > argument was passed.
> > > >
> > > > So e.args is going to stick around in 3.0?
> > >
> > > I think so.
> > I just posted on my blog about this. I am curious to see what the
> > general public think, but I suspect it will stay as well. I was
> > cranky at the sprint because of my 'args' removal. Don't need to make
> > more people cranky.
> > > e.message OTOH I think we can kill (perhaps deprecate it
> > > in 2.6; it was added in 2.5, this may be a record :-).
> > Should we just consider this a PDFL pronouncement, or should we more
> > formally run this past python-dev?
> > -Brett
> --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
More information about the Python-3000