[Python-3000] is it easier to multithread ?
musiccomposition at gmail.com
Fri Aug 1 01:48:32 CEST 2008
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:18 AM, binaryjesus <coolman.guron at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is these any improvement in multi-threaded performance in the py3k
> scheduler over py2?
No. However, 2.6 and 3.0 have gained the multiprocessing module to do
concurrency over multiply processes.
> >From what i know py2 runs only 1 (one) pythn thread at a time (refer 1
> below). Another thing that i would like to see being included in
> python is auto-mutex like the java implementation. That would make my
> life much easier !!
> refer1 : http://softwareramblings.com/2008/07/multi-thread-scaling-issues-with-python-and-ruby.html
> Python-3000 mailing list
> Python-3000 at python.org
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/musiccomposition%40gmail.com
"There's no place like 127.0.0.1."
More information about the Python-3000