[Python-3000] Single buffer implied in new buffer protocol?
oliphant.travis at ieee.org
Fri Jun 6 22:45:10 CEST 2008
Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> So that means it's fine to remove all locking related functionality from the
>> new buffer protocol and leave everything to application space, right?
>> Here is a patch for the PEP that reflects this.
> I filed this as bug #3046.
As I mentioned on the tracker, I support removing the locking API from
PEP 3118. If needed it can be added back later under a separate API
entirely. It is clear that it is a separate issue.
I do think it is a useful issue, however, and would like to see some
discussion of it in the future --- especially in the context of a future
shared memory object for Python.
More information about the Python-3000