<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 6/6/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Collin Winter</b> <<a href="mailto:collinw@gmail.com">collinw@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On 6/6/07, Guido van Rossum <<a href="mailto:guido@python.org">guido@python.org</a>> wrote:<br>> A few PEPs with numbers < 400 are now targeting Python 3000, e.g. PEP<br>> 367 (new super) and PEP 344 (exception chaining). Are there any
<br>> others? I propose that we renumber these to numbers in the 3100+<br>> range. I can see two forms of renaming:<br>><br>> (a) 344 -> 3344 and 367 -> 3367, i.e. add 3000 to the number<br>><br>> (b) just use the next available number
<br>><br>> Preferences?<br>><br>> What other PEPs should be renumbered?<br>><br>> Should we renumber at all?<br><br>Renumbering, +1; using the next 31xx number, +1.</blockquote><div><br><br>+1 on this vote.
<br><br>-Brett <br></div><br></div><br>