[From nobody Tue Sep  4 08:15:08 2007
Return-Path: &lt;m.n.summerfield@googlemail.com&gt;
X-Original-To: comments@amk.ca
Delivered-To: m6824806@spunkymail-mx9.g.dreamhost.com
Received: from punisher.dreamhost.com (sd-green-bigip-66.dreamhost.com
	[208.97.132.66])
	by spunkymail-mx9.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D48ED6D3B
	for &lt;comments@amk.ca&gt;; Sat,  1 Sep 2007 00:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by punisher.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7C3673D2
	for &lt;comments@amk.ca&gt;; Sat,  1 Sep 2007 00:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-DH-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at punisher.dreamhost.com
X-Spam-Score: 0.28
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.28 tagged_above=-999 required=999
	tests=[RCVD_BY_IP=0.28]
Received: from punisher.dreamhost.com ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (punisher.dreamhost.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id mgx03BKA3mPl for &lt;comments@amk.ca&gt;;
	Sat,  1 Sep 2007 00:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.185])
	by punisher.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1E2673C5
	for &lt;comments@amk.ca&gt;; Sat,  1 Sep 2007 00:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id z22so931207fkz
	for &lt;comments@amk.ca&gt;; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 00:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:sender;
	b=oo2Qz8uQ+AT/Nt11pUHEoHy1tK4VGX0he0sH1Fl0tU5AN+SmcX/ldJSGatm9Q0BoY8Kfn/1qRVQ1XasvvoCBbQ/ulWxSFG+nbNv0oNmI+7C1DepREa9w5clrz+n5Vblo1YXzKsJc6jC9QwcJQyobqdGxauIHWs4uu21+RH4dIz8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta;
	h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:sender;
	b=N28jE3XRB1BhZrrv0WD1jBXiv53gpvtevTWMSOpXFqdTSHBTEGsHTfeTKm7sTx1SRJ3/3T/pNhjDBAm3YYzv+4qPxLf4zUczXbZTRIu6RT9GbkLClfg0s76I8sDFtSObN0f8ZkzR1GOqmblNoEBxT7BffucT25uhMvifmyd1Ki4=
Received: by 10.82.154.12 with SMTP id b12mr5485006bue.1188633474629;
	Sat, 01 Sep 2007 00:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?192.168.1.2? ( [87.113.76.205])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b23sm811567ugd.2007.09.01.00.57.52
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Sat, 01 Sep 2007 00:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mark Summerfield &lt;mark@qtrac.eu&gt;
To: comments@amk.ca
Subject: Poss. clarification for What's New in Python 3
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 08:55:42 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset=&quot;us-ascii&quot;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: &lt;200709010855.42665.mark@qtrac.eu&gt;
Sender: Mark Summerfield &lt;m.n.summerfield@googlemail.com&gt;

Hi,

In the What's New in Python 3 document you say

    For example, in Python 2.x, print &quot;A\n&quot;, &quot;B\n&quot; would write &quot;A\nB\n&quot;;
    but in Python 3.0, print(&quot;A\n&quot;, &quot;B\n&quot;) writes &quot;A\n B\n&quot;.


I would be tempted to change this to:

    For example, in Python 2.x, print &quot;A\n&quot;, &quot;B\n&quot; would write &quot;A\nB\n\n&quot;;
    but in Python 3.0, print(&quot;A\n&quot;, &quot;B\n&quot;) writes &quot;A\n B\n\n&quot;.
    Python 3's print() has keyword arguments to control what's
    output between items and what is output at the end, for example,
    print(&quot;A\n&quot;, &quot;B\n&quot;, sep=&quot;&quot;, end=&quot;&quot;) writes &quot;A\nB\n&quot;.

-- 
Mark Summerfield, Qtrac Ltd., www.qtrac.eu

]