[issue5725] process SysV-Semaphore support

[R David Murray]

R David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com> added the comment:

On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 at 09:29, jvdias wrote:
> jvdias <jason.vas.dias at gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> Thanks for responding !

You are welcome.  If you want something to happen, though,
you'll have to get support from the community and submit
a patch.

> Can't Python provide a better print() implementation or a fflush()
> implementation that will enable print()'s buffers to be flushed ?
> Perhaps something like PERL's IO::Handle::autoflush() ?

Is there some way in which sys.stdout.flush() is not equivalent to "an
fflush implementation that will enable print()'s buffers to be flushed"?

> Maybe I should raise another "fflush() support required" bug ?

If it's a real issue, yes.  But I don't think it is.

--David

----------
nosy: +r.david.murray-old

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5725>
_______________________________________