[issue11505] string.py increased test coverage
report at bugs.python.org
Mon Mar 14 20:37:40 CET 2011
New submission from Alicia Arlen <arlen514 at yahoo.com>:
Started from coverage.py results. Only 6 groups of lines did not have coverage. Since the Template class originated in PEP292, those tests were added in test_pep292.py. All Formatter class tests were added in test_string.py.
_invalid test (Lines 89-90):
This error does not naturally occur, so the regex for pattern was overloaded to create the scenario where the format fails on the first character.
_vformat test (line 174):
Forced recursion_depth negative to raise the error.
convert_field (lines 226, 299):
Sent in appropriate convversion requests.
get_field (lines 256-257, 259):
Added fieldname variations to test getattr and getitem lookups.
nosy: Alicia.Arlen, brian.curtin, georg.brandl
title: string.py increased test coverage
versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21130/string_test_coverage.diff
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
More information about the Python-bugs-list