<div dir="ltr">Next available is PEP lucky number 13 🙂<div><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>Mariatta</div></div></div></div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 4:14 PM Barry Warsaw <<a href="mailto:barry@python.org">barry@python.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Jul 18, 2018, at 16:06, Fred Drake <<a href="mailto:fred@fdrake.net" target="_blank">fred@fdrake.net</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> PEP 2 is (currently) the "Procedure for Adding New Modules".  Though<br>
> superseded, recycling the PEP number seems out of character with the<br>
> RFC process from which we derived the PEP process.  Let's be cautious<br>
> about recycling like that; integers are cheap.<br>
<br>
Dang, so it is.  :(<br>
<br>
I don’t want to recycle numbers, so we’ll likely end up taking the next available low ones.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
-Barry<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
python-committers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:python-committers@python.org" target="_blank">python-committers@python.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers</a><br>
Code of Conduct: <a href="https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/</a><br>
</blockquote></div>