[Python-Dev] 2.4a2, and @decorators
barry at python.org
Tue Aug 3 16:53:36 CEST 2004
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 10:32, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I don't understand why you prefer your hack over the established way
> to do decorators pre-2.4, which is
> def foo(): ...
> foo = staticmethod(foo)
> This works across releases (including IronPython), doesn't require any
> magic, is documented, etc. So if your main constraint is that it be
> implementable pre-2.4, you already have a solution. Isn't that much
> better than spending effort on hacks based on sys.settrace (which are
> surely going to produce bafflement from users who aren't familiar with
> that implementation hack)?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20040803/72c063c2/attachment.pgp
More information about the Python-Dev