[Python-Dev] @decorators, the PEP and the "options" out there?
mwh at python.net
Fri Aug 6 15:39:25 CEST 2004
"Phillip J. Eby" <pje at telecommunity.com> writes:
> At 12:24 PM 8/5/04 -0700, IxokaI wrote:
>>I added "with", although I havn't seen it.
> Guido's reserving "with" for this purpose in some future Python:
> with x.y:
> .z = spam # set x.y.z = spam
> print .q.r # print x.y.q.r
Except that the only extant PEP involving with actually uses it for
something else :-)
I think talking about what Guido is or isn't doing is a bit ... wrong?
41. Some programming languages manage to absorb change, but
-- Alan Perlis, http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/perlis-alan/quotes.html
More information about the Python-Dev