[Python-Dev] Last chance!

[Christian Tismer]

Guido van Rossum wrote:

>>since I didn't get *any* reply to this request,
>>either the request was bad or there is really
>>nobody using f_tstate in a way that makes it
>>urgent to keep.
>>I will wait a few hours and then make the change
>>to Stackless, and I'd like to propose to do the
>>same to the Python core.
> 
> 
> I saved the message, but haven't had the time yet to think things
> through.
> 
> I *did* notice at least one case where using f_tstate might actually
> be a mistake: theoretically it's possible that two or more threads
> alternate calling next() on a generator (if they wrap it in a critical
> section); AFAICT the f_tstate is never updated.

I've been running Stackless Python without f_tstate for more than
three months now, in various applications.
May I check in a patch to evict f_tstate?

ciao - chris
-- 
Christian Tismer             :^)   <mailto:tismer at stackless.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware  :     Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a     :    *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin                 :     PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 89 09 53 34  home +49 30 802 86 56  mobile +49 173 24 18 776
PGP 0x57F3BF04       9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619  305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
      whom do you want to sponsor today?   http://www.stackless.com/