[Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues

[Ezio Melotti]

On 06/11/2010 19.01, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 11/6/2010 11:42 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
>> On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:38:22 +0100, Georg Brandl<g.brandl at gmx.net>  
>> wrote:
>>> Am 06.11.2010 05:44, schrieb Ezio Melotti:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 05/11/2010 19.08, Python tracker wrote:
>>>>> ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2010-10-29 - 2010-11-05)
>>>>> Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the 
>>>>> issue.
>>>>> Do NOT respond to this message.
>>>>>
>>>>> Issues counts and deltas:
>>>>>     open    2514 (+17)
>
> This seems wrong. A default search for open issues returns 2452 and it 
> was about the same yesterday just a few hours after the report.
>

That's because the "open" count includes about 25 languishing and 39 
pending issues (technically they are still open).

>>>>>     closed 19597 (+78)
>>>>>     total  22111 (+95)
>>>>
>>>> as suggested in recent mails[0][1] I changed these values to represent
>>>> the deltas with the previous week.
>>>> Now let's try to keep the "open" delta negative ;)
>
> Since there were more issues closed than opened I think it really was. 
> Anyway, we are down 300 from the 2750 peak.
>
>>> That is a worthy goal, however the difference between the "open" and 
>>> "closed"
>>> deltas is already quite an achievement and shows that our triage works.

Yes, even if having a negative delta would be best, having the "closed" 
delta higher than then "open" one is still very good.
So congrats to everyone who worked and works to make this possible.

>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>> We did have negative open deltas for several weeks running in October.
>> Kudos to everyone involved, and lets do it some more :)  I'm looking
>> forward to making a non-trivial dent in the open count during the bug
>> weekend on the 20th/21st.
>
Best Regards,
Ezio Melotti