<div>I don't think it's too risky.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Michael Hudson did the work and it's been checked into the python</div>
<div>CVS for a while. (Python/pystate.c Rev 2.42 and Modules/threadmodule.c Rev 2.64 are required files).</div>
<div> </div>
<div>We're stuck on Python 2.3.3 because of this bug...(2.4 thread code with this bug was backported to 2.3.5).</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Max<br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/22/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Anthony Baxter</b> <<a href="mailto:anthony@interlink.com.au">anthony@interlink.com.au</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">On Thursday 22 September 2005 23:36, Jeremy Maxfield wrote:<br>> Can the fix for [ 1163563 ] Sub threads execute in restricted mode
<br>> (<br>> <a href="http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1163563&gr">http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1163563&gr</a><br>>oup_id=5470&atid=105470 )
<br>> go in before 2.4.2 final?<br>> This is a real show stopper for us - we can't move to 2.4 without<br>> it. Cheers,<br>> Max<br><br>I'm not sure - mwh, how risky a patch is this?<br><br>Anthony<br>--<br>Anthony Baxter <
<a href="mailto:anthony@interlink.com.au">anthony@interlink.com.au</a>><br>It's never too late to have a happy childhood.<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>flickr: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/anothermax/sets">
http://www.flickr.com/photos/anothermax/sets</a>