<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/27/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">"Martin v. Löwis"</b> <<a href="mailto:martin@v.loewis.de">martin@v.loewis.de</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Simon Dahlbacka wrote:<br>> OTOH, the ETA for Vista is "just after" 2.5 release (end of 2006 for<br>> OEM:s, beginning of 2007 for customers), long before 2.6<br>><br>> That said, I don't have any strong preferences either way. (..but I do
<br>> have a x64 Vista machine running ATM)<br><br>Good to know, but unfortunately, not very helpful in the end: Even if<br>I wanted to include these icons, I still had no clue whatsoever on how<br>to do that. What files do I need to deploy into what locations for this
<br>to "work", and how do I determine whether or not to use the "Vista<br>approach" (assuming it is different from the "pre-Vista approach")?</blockquote><div><br>[Disclaimer: the following is what google told me]
<br><br>it seems that the big icons 256x256 are in fact (or at least can be) PNG format within the .ico file.<br>However, the support for these kinds of icons seems to be somewhat lacking, in particular, the current(including VS2005) resource compilers barf when given such an icon.
<br><br>Given that, it does not really seem feasible to include them..<br></div><br>Speaking of icons, do the bundled ico files have to be named py.ico and pyc.ico? (These names does not play along with tab-completion, making the user, me that is, tab twice "unnecessarily" to get to
python.exe)<br><br>/Simon<br><br>A little bit about me:<br>I've almost completed my Computer Engineering(Embedded systems) degree, just need to get my Master's written down. Professionally I've been developing with python for a few years, but currently I mostly work in C# land.. Lurking around on py-dev for a year or so..
<br></div>