<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/27/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Gustavo Carneiro</b> <<a href="mailto:gjcarneiro@gmail.com">gjcarneiro@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div style="direction: ltr;"><div style="direction: ltr;"><span class="q"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div> Besides, Guido's original proposal is not a fix for your problem, either; he only proposes to change the requirement for *sub*packages.
<br></div></blockquote></span></div><div style="direction: ltr;"></div><br> It *is* a solution for my problem. I don't need the __init__.py file for anything, since I don't need anything defined in the the 'foo' namespace, only the subpackages
foo.bar and foo.zbr
.</div></blockquote><div><br>... No. Guido's original proposal is not a fix for your problem, because *it doesn't affect the 'foo' namespace*. Guido's original proposal still requires foo/__init__.py for your namespace to work, it just makes foo/bar/__init__.py and foo/zbr/__init__.py optional.
<br></div></div><br>-- <br>Thomas Wouters <<a href="mailto:thomas@python.org">thomas@python.org</a>><br><br>Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!