<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/5/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Hernan M Foffani</b> <<a href="mailto:hfoffani@gmail.com">hfoffani@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
> > > > Currently, we have two running tracker demos online:<br>> > > ><br>> > > > Roundup:<br>> > > > <a href="http://efod.se/python-tracker/">http://efod.se/python-tracker/
</a><br>> > > ><br>> > > > Jira:<br>> > > > <a href="http://jira.python.atlassian.com/secure/Dashboard.jspa">http://jira.python.atlassian.com/secure/Dashboard.jspa</a><br>><br>><br>
> Is anyone looking at the Google Code Hosting tracker, just for fun? =) (<br>> <a href="http://code.google.com/hosting">code.google.com/hosting</a>, although performance seems to be an issue for now)<br><br>It's propietary code, isn't it?
<br><a href="http://code.google.com/hosting/faq.html#itselfoss">http://code.google.com/hosting/faq.html#itselfoss</a><br>(Is that why you said "just for fun"?)</blockquote><div><br>Yes, it's proprietary, but so what? As Bob pointed out, JIRA is as well. Read the call for trackers and you will see we explicitly said closed-source was fine.
<br><br>But Google Code Hosting is not being considered since it won't have data imported by the deadline for accepting test trackers (it currently doesn't have any support for mass issue uploading).<br><br>-Brett</div></div>