<br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/16/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">"Martin v. Löwis"</b> <<a href="mailto:martin@v.loewis.de">martin@v.loewis.de</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Guido van Rossum schrieb:<br>> I think the test isn't hardly focused enough on int allocation. I<br>> wonder if you could come up with a benchmark that repeatedly allocates<br>> 100s of 1000s of ints and then deletes them?
<br><br>The question is: where to store them? In a pre-allocated list, or in a<br>growing list?</blockquote><div><br>Or you can expose Py_INCREF to Python code. I'm thinking about that for big-mem tests anyway ;-)<br></div>
</div><br>-- <br>Thomas Wouters <<a href="mailto:thomas@python.org">thomas@python.org</a>><br><br>Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!