<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 15:00, Dirkjan Ochtman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dirkjan@ochtman.nl">dirkjan@ochtman.nl</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 23:41, Brett Cannon<<a href="mailto:brett@python.org">brett@python.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> If we make it universal I say it should be '2.x' and '3.x'. The whole 'py'<br>
> prefix is redundant.<br>
<br>
</div>Right, I was aiming for /python/2.x and /python/3.x as well.<br>
<br>
Actually, I currently have /cpython to also make CPython less special<br>
among it's peers, but that idea was met with some resistance on<br>
#python-dev.</blockquote><div><br>Don't worry about doing that right now. When the stdlib gets separated out we can revisit this. But for now just leave it as python.<br><br>-Brett <br></div></div>