<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:29, Olemis Lang <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:olemis@gmail.com">olemis@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Michael Foord<br>
<<a href="mailto:fuzzyman@voidspace.org.uk">fuzzyman@voidspace.org.uk</a>> wrote:<br><div class="im">
> I'm pretty sure I can introduce setUpClass and setUpModule without breaking<br>
> compatibility with existing unittest extensions or backwards compatibility<br>
> issues<br>
<br>
</div>Is it possible to use the names `BeforeClass` and `AfterClass` (just<br>
to be make it look similar to JUnit naming conventions ;o) ?<br>
--<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Olemis.<br></blockquote><div> </div></div>-1. setUp/tearDown is already well established here so I think it should follow the same convention.<br>