<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On May 26, 2010, at 4:55 AM, Brian Quinlan wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: 'Bitstream Vera Sans Mono'; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: monospace; ">I said exactly the opposite of what I meant: futures don't need a reference to the invoker.<br></span></span></blockquote></div><br><div>Indeed they don't, and they really shouldn't have one. If I wrote that they did, then it was an error.</div><div><br></div><div>... and that appears to be it! Thank you for your very gracious handling of a pretty huge pile of criticism :).</div><div><br></div><div>Good luck with the PEP,</div><div><br></div><div>-glyph</div><div><br></div></body></html>