<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:24, Antoine Pitrou <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:solipsis@pitrou.net">solipsis@pitrou.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 15:18:12 -0800<br>
Brett Cannon <<a href="mailto:brett@python.org">brett@python.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> OK, so the sentence is poorly phrased, but in the list of tasks it is<br>
> labeled explicitly as intermediate when one is comfortable with the<br>
> process, not a newbie. Does that alleviate the worry you both have?<br>
<br>
</div>It does seem to alleviate it :) Sorry for not noticing!<br>
However, could the following be removed from the list:<br>
<br>
“Is there a proper unit test that can reproduce the bug?”<br>
<br>
We don't need or require unit tests to reproduce bugs; and besides,<br>
some things simply are very difficult to write an unit test for. A<br>
reporter need not be an experienced Python developer able (or willing)<br>
to write an elaborate unit test reproducing, for example, a timing<br>
issue involving Unix signals and the IO stack ;)<br><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Fair enough. I will remove it. </div></div>