<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:06, anatoly techtonik <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:techtonik@gmail.com">techtonik@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Georg Brandl <<a href="mailto:g.brandl@gmx.net">g.brandl@gmx.net</a>> wrote:<br>
> On 30.04.2011 16:53, anatoly techtonik wrote:<br>
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:37 AM, R. David Murray <<a href="mailto:rdmurray@bitdance.com">rdmurray@bitdance.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> The hardest part is debugging the TAL when you make a mistake, but<br>
>>> even that isn't a whole lot worse than any other templating language.<br>
>><br>
>> How much in % is it worse than Django templating language?<br>
><br>
> I'm just guessing here, but I'd say 47.256 %.<br>
<br>
</div>That means switching to Django templates will make Roundup design<br>
plumbing work 47.256% more attractive for potential contributors.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>What if these "potential contributors" never surface? Then we've made a 47.256% change in attractiveness, which is a 1423.843% waste of time.</div>
</div>